Thursday, December 17, 2009

Slow progress at Copenhagen talks



Talks remain deadlocked at the climate summit in Copenhagen with just two days left to seal a global emissions pact.



Developed and developing nations remain at odds over who should cut emissions, how deep the cuts should be, and how much aid should go to poor countries.


But there has been some progress - wealthy nations pledged new funds to bankroll the war on global warming.


At least 130 world leaders are due to join the talks on Thursday, hoping to sign a new climate pact on Friday.


There is widespread scepticism that a deal can be reached.


However, German Chancellor Angela Merkel has said the news from Copenhagen was "not good" and called US pledges to cut carbon emissions insufficient.


An unnamed Danish official said hopes for a deal were slim because of the stalled talks.


Addressing the summit on Thursday, Australian Prime Minister Kevin Rudd said he feared "a triumph of form over substance" at the outcome of the UN climate summit.


In his speech, UK Prime Minister Gordon Brown urged the summit to "summon up the greatest level of ambition".


"The success of our endeavours depends on us forging a new alliance," he told delegates.


He added: "In these few days in Copenhagen which will be blessed or blamed for generations to come, we cannot permit the politics of narrow self-interest to prevent a policy for human survival."


COPENHAGEN LATEST


· Australia's Kevin Rudd, Indonesia's Susilo Yudhoyono, France's Nicolas Sarkozy and Germany's Angela Merkel and UK's Gordon Brown among world leaders due to address the conference on Thursday


· Japan offers $5bn a year to poor nations if a deal is reached


· Australia, France, Japan, Norway, the UK and US collectively commit $3.5bn over three years to combating deforestation


Speakers set to address the summit on Thursday include Ms Merkel, Mr Brown, Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula de Silva and Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.


US President Barack Obama is due to attend the final day of the meeting on Friday, when world leaders will try to lay out a strategy to deal with climate change after the end of 2012, when obligations run out under the landmark Kyoto Protocol.


'Dangerous point'


Developing countries, led by China, accused host Denmark of a lack of transparency by suggesting language for the agreement without full consultation by all sides on the 194-nation summit.


And China told participants that it saw no chance of reaching an operational accord this week, an unnamed official told Reuters news agency.


Danish Prime Minister Lars Loekke Rasmussen has taken charge of the Wednesday-Friday segment involving heads of state and government.


Denmark said it was trying to simplify several complex draft negotiating texts to help the world leaders to agree on a deal.


But BBC environment correspondent Roger Harrabin, in Copenhagen, says the Danish hosts do not appear to have worked out how the political leaders will take part in the formal UN negotiating process.


That process itself has been in disarray, our correspondent says, with nations refusing to agree with the Danish prime minister's demands that they should negotiate on a slimmed down text.


Containing emissions to a level associated with a temperature rise of no more than 2C is the stated aim of the big nations here.


As things are going they will miss that target by a considerable margin, our correspondent says.


The poorest and most vulnerable nations say emissions should be contained to a level associated with a temperature rise of 1 or 1.5C.


They have no chance of getting their way, our correspondent adds.


'Knife edge'


After a day of long delays and finger-pointing on Wednesday, Britain's Energy and Climate Change Secretary, Ed Milliband, said the prospects for reaching a deal were on a knife-edge.


"People can kill this process, kill the agreement with process argument," Mr Miliband said, warning the talks were at a "very dangerous point".


But BBC environment correspondent Richard Black says that for developing countries, the ongoing wrangles about how negotiations should proceed is not a matter of process but of substance.


They say they have been negotiating on and off for nine months, and want to see that process through to its conclusion.


The president of the European Commission, Jose Manuel Barroso, also said he was disappointed with the slow pace of negotiations, whilst Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez said: "If the climate was a bank, a capitalist bank, [the West] would have saved it by now."


On a more promising note, Japan promised poorer nations $15bn (£9bn) over three years if a deal is made.


The amount - payable from 2010-2012 - adds to the $10.6bn (£6.5bn) commitment over three years made by EU leaders at their summit last week.


Another pledge came from a six-member group - Australia, France, Japan, Norway, the UK and US - which will collectively commit $3.5bn over three years to combat deforestation.


Ethiopian Prime Minister Meles Zenawi, speaking on behalf of the African Union, also announced dramatically reduced expectations for climate aid from rich nations.


Tensions also flared outside the summit, where police used clubs and tear gas to stop some 2,500 activists who tried to march on the tightly-guarded Bella Center.


Police detained some 260 protesters during the clashes, which led to injuries on both sides.







Bottom of Form


A working laboratory for energy technologies


Energy efficiency in Denmark has been created by a range of new technologies, and today, this can serve as an example of how one can create a high level of growth without a corresponding increase in greenhouse gas emissions.


Ministry of Climate and Energy of Denmark

Maybe number eight does not sound like all that much, but there are reasons to look more closely at the Danish example. A top placement among the world’s most energy-efficient and climate-friendly economies has been achieved despite the fact that Denmark does not have any hydroelectric power resources worth mentioning, nor the large forest areas that typically form the basis for a large part of a country’s production of renewable energy. Neither does Denmark use nuclear power, which is a large source of CO2-free energy in other countries in the same group.

Energy efficiency in Denmark has been created by a range of new technologies and solutions, and this can today serve as an example of how one can create a high level of growth without a corresponding increase in energy consumption or greenhouse gas emissions.

The means to achieve this has partly been a strong political focus on energy policy. Denmark was one of the first countries to set out detailed plans for developing the energy sector back in the 1970s. Added to this has been the strong commitment of the Danish business sector to developing – and using – energy-efficient solutions. The windmill industry is the best-known example of this, but there is much more. A common-sense approach to energy-efficient measures such as insulating houses and cost savings in production has gone hand in hand with high-tech solutions for the whole society. For example there is an electricity supply system that can handle the fact that windmills supply, in periods, more than 100 per cent of the energy required, and in other periods supply nothing at all. And it can do this in a competitive manner.

The last factor is the strong focus on energy saving and a secure energy supply, which has been the case since the oil crises in the 1970s. In 1985 the Danish parliament (Folketinget) rejected nuclear power and opted to focus on new, sustainable sources of energy. Denmark in 2009 is in many ways a dynamic, working laboratory for the meeting of new energy technologies and old common sense in its relationship with nature. (Photo: Eva Rosenqvist/Scanpix)